Comparison
Cordavo vs Apollo
Apollo is great for sequencing and self-serve data. Cordavo is for teams that want researched, high-intent accounts with angles and verified contacts delivered continuously.
Quick verdict
Choose Cordavo if you want a small, steady stream of researched accounts with context and angles. Choose Apollo if you want to control search, sequencing, and do your own research at volume.
Best for
Cordavo: founder-led teams, lean SDR orgs, RevOps needing quality over quantity.
Apollo: teams that want to run their own targeting and sequencing at high volume.
| Criteria | Cordavo | Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| What you get | Curated, researched accounts with mini briefs, evidence, risks, and 1–3 verified contacts. | Large database access and sequencing; you do your own research and filtering. |
| Volume vs. quality | Low-volume, high-intent accounts delivered continuously. | High-volume search and export; quality depends on your filters and enrichment. |
| Angles & messaging | First-touch angles included per account, based on live signals. | Templates available but no account-specific angle or signal context. |
| Contacts | Verified work emails and roles; focused on the right personas per account. | Large contact coverage; variable freshness and accuracy based on segment. |
| Who runs the research | Cordavo handles discovery, validation, and drafting; you focus on sending. | You run searches, dedupe, enrich, and validate fit yourself. |
Why teams pick Cordavo
They want fewer, better accounts with context, not just contacts. They want verified emails, angles, and risks already identified so they can send credible first touches the same day.
Next step
See an anonymized mini report and how it slots into your CRM or outreach tool.